Leaving in 2024/Bringing to 2025

Leaving in 2024:

Overly Detailed Plans: The era of micromanaging every inch of urban space with exhaustive planning documents might be on its way out. These plans often become outdated quickly and can stifle adaptability.

Permits for Everything: The bureaucratic red tape associated with minor changes or developments has shown to slow down innovation and responsiveness in urban settings. Simplifying or speeding up permit processes is becoming a priority.

Trying to Please Everyone: Urban planning often aimed at consensus can lead to watered-down solutions that don't serve any group particularly well. Moving away from this means making decisions that might not be universally popular but are effective.

Overly-Techy Approach: While technology is undeniably important, an over-reliance on tech solutions without considering human elements or practical application can lead to inefficient urban environments.

Bringing in 2024:

Dead Reckoning/Old College Try: There's a return to trusting intuition and experience alongside data. This approach allows for more dynamic and adaptive planning where planners might take calculated risks based on their expertise rather than just data.

Common Sense/Cost Effective: Emphasizing practicality and efficiency in planning, focusing on what genuinely improves quality of life without breaking the bank. This might include simple solutions like better street lighting or more pedestrian-friendly designs over high-tech alternatives.

Belief in Your Design: Confidence in one's vision can lead to more creative and impactful urban spaces. Architects are encouraged to stand by their designs, knowing that not all feedback might lead to improvement.

Space for Amenities: Recognizing that urban life isn't just about functionality but also about the quality of life, cities are prioritizing spaces for leisure, community interaction, and green spaces. This includes parks, community centers, and public art installations that enrich urban living.