Luigi Mangione could possibly be the wrong suspect

Think about it: if Mangione really was the killer, his behavior doesn’t make sense at all. He wasn’t careful at all. Pulling down his mask in front of a camera just because someone flirted with him? Rookie mistake. Stopping at Starbucks right before committing the crime, leaving behind DNA evidence? Sloppy. And get this—he kept the gun and fake ID for DAYS after killing the CEO. That’s amateur stuff, not what you’d expect from someone capable of orchestrating a murder.

But the real kicker? He went to a McDonald’s in public after the fact. Like, who does that if they’re actually trying to lay low? Either this guy was extremely reckless , or... there’s a bigger story here. What if these “mistakes” weren’t mistakes at all but intentional moves to make him look guilty while the real shooter walked away clean?

It’s chilling how perfectly all the clues seem to point to him, almost like it’s scripted. Could Mangione be a convenient scapegoat for someone else’s crime? Something just doesn’t add up, and the more I think about it, the more I feel like we’re being played.