CMV: Even if a certain idealogy or worldview produced a "perfectly" functional society for humanity, I would want to see it's destruction if I didn't like certain elements of it

That is, if it had other results that were required that created circumstances I couldn't tolerate.

As an example, not too long ago I was doing a bit of research into monarchism. Monarchists were fascinating to me until I learned how they tend to hold similar beliefs that I've seen before, some of them bigoted, but not all, some are just based on falsehoods, or just a view of having power over others I couldn't abide by. I don't like monarchy, or at least hereditary monarchy so much, that even if it those monarchists could deliver on all thier wild promises, I'd still want to destroy it, it seems I don't want a functional society, but one in which I like. (If you consider some republics to work as a sort of monarchy, I've heard that before, I don't necessarily disagree, and I have problems with current authorities as it is. I am consistent, or try to be.)

I had another example, but I'm concerned it might violate a rule. It had to do with sexuality and natalism.

If I think if another example, maybe I'll try and edit it in. I don't like that this could be contentious, I don't want to get off topic by dragging hot topics to mid sling about into it, even if my topic has everything to do with politics.

And I certainly don't want this to be about specific politics, as you'll find I might not change my veiw about many of those things. I could be the worst human being, and yet I'd be here asking more about my hesitation towards gradual change in human societies over time. The particular sides and who "should win" isn't the point.

It's that if you just can't stand a certain change, no matter what, no matter the reasons, why should one accept that change?

I would prefer you kept answers like "if it changes regardless of what you think, why kick the pricks?" to yourself. I would have no problem with causing human extinction if the only way to have a functional society was abhorrent to me. It's not that I wouldn't want to live in this world anymore if things didn't go how I wanted, it's that I don't want those who would be happy with a society I wasn't happy to be in, to be able to have the satisfaction of living in it either. I don't care if I lose, I just wouldn't want my "enemies", whoever they might be, to be allowed to win. Call it petty if you like, I don't care.

But, this attitude I have is what I'm questioning, and so I look towards challenging it from outside opinion.

Edit: due to confusion I will specify my enemies to give you an idea. Autocrats, monarchists, corporatists, extreme evangelical christians, anyone supporting Sharia law, anti-lgbt (I didn't want to violate a rule, sorry.), any bigots, probably a few others, note that many of us would consider them right wing. But I didn't want to make this about specific politics, imagine if it was the reverse, that I was the rightie bigot trying to work out why I should consider a positive change if I didn't like it. It's not a question of specific issues, but of attitude regarding reacting to changes of understanding of truth of how society can function.